@Kat_Missouri You mean we should only attempt to prosecute banks using a low grade war? They invented that kind of network.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel That is equating a white collar crime w/ actual violent activity. And, as far as I know, no bank has issued declaration of war1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Kat_Missouri
@Kat_Missouri No. They were smart in simply attacking without declaring war. I'll grant you that.2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel To be accepted. But, it does not mean we are not allowed to respond in the proper manner.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Kat_Missouri
@Kat_Missouri Just as we have not responded to the networked, partly clandestine attackers called "banks" properly.2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Again, this is apples and oranges. an internal, possibly bad actor, against a known external bad actor.2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @Kat_Missouri
@Kat_Missouri Sorry: which is internal and which external? Cause if AQ isn't internal we can shut down entire dragnet.2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel All external enemies have always sought to reach inside the borders of another nation to do it damage. Clausewitz.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Kat_Missouri
@Kat_Missouri So they're both internal and external networks attempting to use clandestine ops to sabotage the state?1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel There's an external network trying to set up an internal network, but let's not conflate a violent enemy w/ possible fraud2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@Kat_Missouri You seem to have a very limited understanding of the threat the banks pose, and the crimes they have already admitted to.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.