The 2 judges who ruled on Section 215 reached opposite conclusions… but both assumed comprehensiveness, and it mattered in their logic
-
-
@emptywheel One thing I did notice about the Pauley decision, at the bottom of page 12. He makes the following statement:Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@emptywheel "the gov't acknowledged that it has collected metadata for substantially every telephone call in the United States since 2006." -
@conor64 Not sure but I think that comes from 2011 Congressional report I also pointed to (use of word "substantially" key).
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@emptywheel Cites Shea declaration, paragraph 13… which doesn’t say that at all. It’s bizarre.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@emptywheel@conor64 Agree. The new reports seem timed to undercut the standing analysis in Klayman, on the heels of his Sup Ct petition. -
@PatrickCToomey@emptywheel@conor64 How about a chart listing what collection is done on what authorities? -
@dametzger It's a moving target. That's what I'm suggesting the Vodaphone/Verizon split creates. New moves.@PatrickCToomey@conor64 -
@emptywheel@PatrickCToomey@conor64 Understood and there are things you can't know but still, a graphic listing your best info be helpful.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.