@csoghoian That may well be (and I'm not saying that this didn't go overboard) but associating with criminals can be risky.
-
-
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq Doesn't seem to carry any risk for JPMorgan Chase. You mean SOME criminals.@csoghoian1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@csoghoian Not everything JPMC does is criminal (most isn't). Does Anonymous do anything legal? Produce goods? Pay taxes?3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq But yes, the ENTIRE POINT is that Anon also engages in dissident speech.@csoghoian1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@csoghoian By attacking PayPal, RIAA, MPAA, the NYSE, Stratfor? Dissident speech sure has changed.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq You are engaging in very dangerous guilt by association.@csoghoian2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@csoghoian I think people need to be more careful. Do I want to stop people from freely associating? No, but use common sense!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@BradMossEsq That's what the Saudis say too. @csoghoian
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.