@jamesrbuk Yes. "could be NSA/GCHQ" != "was definitely NSA/GCHQ". Still, an interesting story worth watching.
@mattblaze "some intel agency" is not NSA/GCHQ, was sort of my point. @jamesrbuk @NCWeaver
-
-
@emptywheel@jamesrbuk@NCWeaver Yes. Caveats like "may" "possibly", etc. are very appropriate here.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.