@jamesrbuk Yes. "could be NSA/GCHQ" != "was definitely NSA/GCHQ". Still, an interesting story worth watching.
@mattblaze I guess question is, what motive would NSA have & who would have more likely motive who knew abt Belgacom? @jamesrbuk @NCWeaver
-
-
@emptywheel@jamesrbuk@NCWeaver Not hard to imagine why some intel agency might do this, but not clear why they'd consider it worth risk. -
@mattblaze "some intel agency" is not NSA/GCHQ, was sort of my point.@jamesrbuk@NCWeaver -
@emptywheel@jamesrbuk@NCWeaver Yes. Caveats like "may" "possibly", etc. are very appropriate here.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.