This @WSJ story on NSA deliberations at White House cites only one named source (on a minor matter). http://online.wsj.com/news/article_email/SB10001424052702303743604579355221879331080-lMyQjAxMTA0MDMwMTEzNDEyWj … < credible
-
-
Replying to @dangillmor
@dangillmor especially doesn't cite a single privacy advocate, none of whom I know who'd agree w/characterization in 3rd-to-last ¶.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel i missed that on first read... good point.1 reply 1 retweet 1 like
Replying to @dangillmor
@dangillmor Entire thing is very ... interesting, esp for a Friday night story. Maybe someone thinks the RG is getting stroppy?
6:18 PM - 31 Jan 2014
0 replies
1 retweet
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.