@emptywheel Now that's an interesting thought. You thinking an "accomplice" could qualify under 215 as a seed identifier?
-
-
-
@BradMossEsq Not under phone dragnet, as usage stated (bc it's not CT). But they could use Section 215 for other records.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@emptywheel Ha! How convenient! Though you don't think journos have always been targets?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.