@NCWeaver For LE but Robert Litt says if they get something legally they can search for FI purposes w/o one. @lorenzoFB @normative
@normative And I assume they DO call it whatever is more convenient. @granick @NCWeaver @lorenzoFB
-
-
@emptywheel@normative@granick@NCWeaver My Q: Shouldn't they get rid of the DB except parts that were relevant to Freedom Hosting inv.? -
@lorenzoFB@emptywheel@normative@granick@NCWeaver They already knew that Silk Road users were using TorMail. -
@runasand@emptywheel@normative@granick@NCWeaver yeah, it's shaky legal ground though. Very interesting situation. -
@lorenzoFB@emptywheel@normative@granick@NCWeaver Shaky to find evidence in one case that happens to be relevant for another case? -
@runasand@lorenzoFB@emptywheel@granick@NCWeaver This Orin Kerr paper, esp. §III(D), is highly relevant: http://www.harvardlawreview.org/media/pdf/kerr.pdf … -
@normative Very cool. Thanks.@runasand@lorenzoFB@granick@NCWeaver
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.