@NCWeaver For LE but Robert Litt says if they get something legally they can search for FI purposes w/o one. @lorenzoFB @normative
@granick Right, that's what I said. Litt says not even RAS required to search. @NCWeaver @lorenzoFB @normative
-
-
@emptywheel@NCWeaver@lorenzoFB@normative Agreed, and perhaps LE warrantlessly searches (but doesn't use...yet), too? -
@granick After PATRIOT, how do you distinguish bt a FI and a LE search? No distinction.@NCWeaver@lorenzoFB@normative -
@emptywheel@granick@NCWeaver@lorenzoFB I don’t actually think that’s right. May not be a SHARP distinction, but that’s not the same. -
@normative And I assume they DO call it whatever is more convenient.@granick@NCWeaver@lorenzoFB -
@emptywheel@normative@granick@NCWeaver My Q: Shouldn't they get rid of the DB except parts that were relevant to Freedom Hosting inv.? -
@lorenzoFB@emptywheel@normative@granick@NCWeaver They already knew that Silk Road users were using TorMail. -
@runasand@emptywheel@normative@granick@NCWeaver yeah, it's shaky legal ground though. Very interesting situation. -
@lorenzoFB@emptywheel@normative@granick@NCWeaver Shaky to find evidence in one case that happens to be relevant for another case? - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.