@BradMossEsq Again, you're playing dumb here.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel No, just very strict about adherence to security obligations. I have a clearance myself, I don't play games with that.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq And Snowden makes a better show of adhering to the Constitution than the dipshits who're baghdad bobbing themselves.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel As I have said before, if he had kept things to the parts he thought were unlawful, I would have more sympathy.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq Yes. You've said that. But NOW you're bitching he's using dipshit moves by govt to point out THEY don't respect Constitution.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Actually what I said was does anyone really think the USG is dumb enough to do it.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq You seem to have a real problem w/holding NatSec people accountable their statements. Are they exempt?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Nope. But I'm also real tired of hearing that vague assertions by them are "propaganda" but from Snowden it's taken as gospel.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq Are you gonna tell EuroPress they shouldn't comment on what America's Baghdad Bobs say bc they're stupid so should be ignored?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Not what I said. When either they or Snowden make vague claims, should be treated as such on both ends.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@BradMossEsq What you are NOW whining abt is that people made threats and they (incl top officials) not dismissed as cranks.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.