@GPIngersoll I choose to let you pretend you know how to read. Prove you know how to use Google. Look for China and sabotage, eg.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel It's because you can't. There's not a single time when a Snowden rev has elicited a measured call for more context.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GPIngersoll
@GPIngersoll Me, the only person pointing out that BOTH defenders and opponents assessing dragnet w/o enough info.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel This is an indictment against US spy agencies ... (setting aside whether I agree or not) this is obviously not what I mean.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GPIngersoll
@GPIngersoll Anyway. THere's plenty more like that. You might learn to read before you make false narratives. Buhbye.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Right, you're missing the point, perhaps intentionally. Setting aside childish ad hominem's, you might want to engage the topic.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GPIngersoll
@GPIngersoll Um. You're the one who engaged in butthurt. I'm not sure you're the person to claim ad hom when he's been proven wrong.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel You took a report about Ch/Rus spying and asked for more details about American spying. You never do the reverse. Show me where.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GPIngersoll
@GPIngersoll No. Your representation is patently false. I called for more details abt who selectively reports and who doesn't.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Which is the opposite of actually acknowledging the meaning of the headline ...4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@GPIngersoll Again, I already informed you that my tweet was not about the headline. You know there WAS an article there too?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.