@GPIngersoll Why don't you browse my work. You'll learn some things.
@GPIngersoll Um. You're the one who engaged in butthurt. I'm not sure you're the person to claim ad hom when he's been proven wrong.
-
-
@emptywheel You took a report about Ch/Rus spying and asked for more details about American spying. You never do the reverse. Show me where. -
@GPIngersoll No. Your representation is patently false. I called for more details abt who selectively reports and who doesn't. -
@emptywheel Which is the opposite of actually acknowledging the meaning of the headline ... -
@GPIngersoll You were proven wrong. My record proves I've talked a lot abt Chinese hacking & called for more details on how extensive it is. -
@emptywheel Certainly, but not in the context of Snowden revelations. This context has nothing to do with American spying. Why mention? -
@GPIngersoll Hi. I have data analysis to do. You might try it. You'd learn something. Buhbye. -
@emptywheel Sure, I bet you could teach me well how to prop up a narrative in the face of destabilizing information.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.