@GPIngersoll Let me repeat. I'm calling for GENERALIZED info collection. You call that bias. You're defending collecting only on adversaries
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel If so, where? Point me in the direction where you insisted on more generalized info?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GPIngersoll
@GPIngersoll Why don't you browse my work. You'll learn some things.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel 1 I know where your website is ... I know what you write ... again, I ask, show me an instnce where you met Snowden revelations2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GPIngersoll
@GPIngersoll You apparently DON'T know what I write. Again, we HAVE other info (tho I've suggested we should know if China sabotages us.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel You can't shoot me a single link when you responded to Snowden revs with calls for "generalized" info?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GPIngersoll
@GPIngersoll I choose to let you pretend you know how to read. Prove you know how to use Google. Look for China and sabotage, eg.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel It's because you can't. There's not a single time when a Snowden rev has elicited a measured call for more context.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GPIngersoll
@GPIngersoll Me, the only person pointing out that BOTH defenders and opponents assessing dragnet w/o enough info.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel This is an indictment against US spy agencies ... (setting aside whether I agree or not) this is obviously not what I mean.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@GPIngersoll It is? No. It's call to understand what purpose these programs serve before we assess them.
That is calling for more context.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.