@GPIngersoll That should be obvious w/basic reading skills. But you chose instead to engage in hyperbolic outrage. @nicoleperlroth
-
-
@emptywheel 1 I know where your website is ... I know what you write ... again, I ask, show me an instnce where you met Snowden revelations -
@GPIngersoll You apparently DON'T know what I write. Again, we HAVE other info (tho I've suggested we should know if China sabotages us. -
@emptywheel You can't shoot me a single link when you responded to Snowden revs with calls for "generalized" info? -
@GPIngersoll I choose to let you pretend you know how to read. Prove you know how to use Google. Look for China and sabotage, eg. -
@emptywheel It's because you can't. There's not a single time when a Snowden rev has elicited a measured call for more context. -
@GPIngersoll Me, the only person pointing out that BOTH defenders and opponents assessing dragnet w/o enough info. -
@emptywheel This is an indictment against US spy agencies ... (setting aside whether I agree or not) this is obviously not what I mean. -
@GPIngersoll Anyway. THere's plenty more like that. You might learn to read before you make false narratives. Buhbye. - 9 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@emptywheel 2 calls for more "generalized" info?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.