@KevinBankston In fact we do seem to agree.
-
-
Replying to @bartongellman
@bartongellman Also seems security hawks & privacy defenders agree 3rd part bulk data storage is a bad idea, tho for varying reasons...1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @KevinBankston
@KevinBankston So it's a status quo or nothing debate? How do you see that one coming out?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bartongellman
@bartongellman Where status quo = NSA stores bulk & nothing = no one does? Think so. Hopeful for latter--if I wasn't I wouldn't do job I do.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KevinBankston
@KevinBankston Right. I don't see much support for 3d party storage. Obama didn't endorse. So it looks like current prog or stop collection.4 replies 2 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bartongellman
@bartongellman And conventional wisdom (FWIW) is that when 215 expiration comes in summer 2015, not enough votes to preserve status quo...2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @KevinBankston
@KevinBankston That's a long time from now. Will be interesting to see how it develops.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bartongellman
emptywheel Retweeted Mike
@bartongellman@KevinBankston Did you guys see this? https://twitter.com/_cypherpunks_/status/424986948974170112 … May well change the debate.emptywheel added,
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
-
Replying to @bartongellman
@bartongellman@emptywheel Confused--we knew Verizon received bulk 215s. What's the new info? I'm missing something.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@KevinBankston Verizon is referred to in a PRIMARY order as subject of order. I always thought that redaction was "telecoms" @bartongellman
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.