@granick @marciahofmann @astepanovich Rhetorical question, obvs. If we're being invited to litigate serious FISA questions, we should try.
-
-
Replying to @KevinBankston
@KevinBankston@marciahofmann@astepanovich Democracy means laws are public, not in the hands of a special few. Including you and me.1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @granick
@granick@marciahofmann@astepanovich Oh, please. Where did I advocate for secret law? I object to secret FISA common law as much as you do.4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @KevinBankston
@KevinBankston@marciahofmann@astepanovich Better than nothing? Perhaps. But imho it is just tinkering w the machinery of tyranny.2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @granick
@KevinBankston@marciahofmann@astepanovich My ? was if you think advocate = effective reform. I *think* you say: yes, but incrementally.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KevinBankston
@KevinBankston@granick Oh, you two. It's just like old times.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @marciahofmann
@marciahofmann@KevinBankston@granick Unlike Kevin, Jon Eisenberg has experience in a SCIF. Problem solved?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TyreJim
@TyreJim Oh, they're not gonna let Eisenberg be advocate. Just on principle--it'd involve paying $$@marciahofmann@KevinBankston@granick1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel True. I was just Tyring of the incessant bickering among my friends@marciahofmann@KevinBankston@granick3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@TyreJim Now you'll just have to return to bickering. @marciahofmann @KevinBankston @granick
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.