@SabrinaSiddiqui @emptywheel @ThePlumLineGS I'm more optimistic than that. He said minimization for 702, changes to 215 custody and query.
-
-
Replying to @MiekeEoyang
@MiekeEoyang He very pointedly didn't call for legislative changes to back 702 changes. He won't either.@SabrinaSiddiqui@ThePlumLineGS1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Yes, implementation for 702 reform can be done either through changes to 12333 or USSID 18.@SabrinaSiddiqui@ThePlumLineGS2 replies 2 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MiekeEoyang
@MiekeEoyang And that's all he intends--he gave that to DNI and AG to implement.@SabrinaSiddiqui@ThePlumLineGS1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel You really don't want Congress further down in the weeds in 702 implementation.@SabrinaSiddiqui@ThePlumLineGS1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @MiekeEoyang
@MiekeEoyang Backdoor search too big a problem to leave to Exec--& Bates said FISC has no clue how its used@SabrinaSiddiqui@ThePlumLineGS1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel But Congress to resolve? I had to explain a botnet attack. You think they get big data?@SabrinaSiddiqui@ThePlumLineGS3 replies 1 retweet 0 likes
@MiekeEoyang No. But back door search is easy: It's USP content w/o even RAS. That's easy. @SabrinaSiddiqui @ThePlumLineGS
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.