Some of what John Bates says is borderline crazy, but he does agree w/@normative Review Group NSL recs would lead govt to use 215 instead.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@normative Even if Sec 215 modified also to require judicial approval for "seed" identifier RAS decision?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq@emptywheel Doesn’t matter; whole point of NSLs is they don’t require judicial approval. Otherwise they’re just a weak 215.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @normative
@normative@emptywheel Arguably justification to phase them out and run it all through 215 with FISC determinations for "seed" identifiers.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq Note Comey said judicial review (and prevention of bulk) w/NSLs would lead to more GJ subpoenas.@normative1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@BradMossEsq Yeah, I think that’s right.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@normative Which suggests they always could have been GJ subpoenas. @BradMossEsq
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.