Some of what John Bates says is borderline crazy, but he does agree w/@normative Review Group NSL recs would lead govt to use 215 instead.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@normative Even if Sec 215 modified also to require judicial approval for "seed" identifier RAS decision?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq@emptywheel Doesn’t matter; whole point of NSLs is they don’t require judicial approval. Otherwise they’re just a weak 215.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @normative
@normative I think there MAY be one other purpose: to preserve ignorance on FISC abt bulk NSLs. But that's all speculation. @BradMossEsq
9:02 AM - 15 Jan 2014
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.