@DaveedGR So Q is what kind of brutishness is most dangerous? Banks running things, when they are a FAR bigger threat? @papicek @nadabakos
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@papicek@nadabakos This seems somewhat afield, since I have made no claims about relative dangers.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DaveedGR
@DaveedGR Then you are assuming certain things about relative dangers.@papicek@nadabakos2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@papicek@nadabakos Similarly, I'm sure you see me as a wolf. Last year I wrote this:http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/09/time-for-the-gop-to-get-serious-about-climate-change-the-new-national-security-issue/262428/ …2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DaveedGR
@DaveedGR I mean, if banks and climate are far afield, why aren't VNSAs?@papicek@nadabakos2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@papicek@nadabakos "Retreated"? They're part of the "authoritrian/non-authoritarian" dynamic in a way the others are not.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DaveedGR
@DaveedGR Indeed, perhaps best sign of "wolf" someone who de-emphasizes far greater threats for VNSAs -- why do that?@papicek@nadabakos1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@papicek@nadabakos I don't de-emphasize them. Be careful with your accusations, please.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DaveedGR
@DaveedGR We went from wolf-bunny to Hobbes/Rousseau (inexplicably, IMO), to VNSAs but NOT bigger threats. Why?@papicek@nadabakos6 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@papicek@nadabakos The anti-authoritarian view may be less likely to punish banks or act against CC.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@DaveedGR You're assuming here that banks aren't the "authority" pole, no? Better ask OWS about that. @papicek @nadabakos
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.