@papicek Different bt radical and extreme, admittedly. Which is why extreme authoritarians can be invisible. @DaveedGR @nadabakos
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@papicek@nadabakos "Authoritarian" is a very negative. The scale presumes ppl who weigh values differently are authoritarian.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DaveedGR
@DaveedGR Rename it then. It's a clear pole, though, w/one side considered "normal" even if extremist.@papicek@nadabakos2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@papicek@nadabakos Libertarian/non-libertarian. You're getting at the same dynamic without labeling people authoritarian.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DaveedGR
@DaveedGR I object to that. It's a political party, one including Ted Cruz who's actually authoritarian.@papicek@nadabakos2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@papicek@nadabakos Framing people who do not think like you as authoritarian is a tool of delegitimization rather than mapping.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DaveedGR
@DaveedGR Call it "bunnies" & "wolves." "Wolves" is normative position which therefore doesn't get treated as extreme@papicek@nadabakos2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@papicek@nadabakos I actually like that framing better. I think I would go with "Hobbes" and "Rousseau," maybe?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DaveedGR
@DaveedGR Like bunnies and wolves better. I think both Hobbes and Rousseau don't apply very well now.@papicek@nadabakos1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@papicek@nadabakos I think Hobbes is *highly* relevant to struggles between VNSAs and the state.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@DaveedGR TCO bankster criminals actually far bigger threat to state now. So where are they on the bunny/wolf measure? @papicek @nadabakos
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.