@20committee @emptywheel Legit q: Doesn't Guardian story http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/21/gchq-cables-secret-world-communications-nsa … say 850K had access to GCHQ db, not access to Snowden docs?
-
-
-
Replying to @20committee
@20committee I did. I'm only referencing specific story I linked to (that you had earlier) - it seems the claims don't match up@emptywheel1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @20committee
@20committee Which isn't to say it isn't made somewhere or I disagree with you - just not seeing it here@emptywheel2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @astepanovich
@astepanovich Again it is made, here: http://juliansmithmp.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/AR-letter-to-Julian-Smith-MP-7-Nov-2013.pdf …@20committee thus far has chosen to leave known errors in post.1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel That's what I was looking for. Thanks.@20committee2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @astepanovich
.
@astepanovich@emptywheel The letter is still a LIE. FYI.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@20committee I don't think either @astepanovich or I are challenging compartment issue. But you've introduced error into your arg.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.