.@20committee is entirely correct: 850,000 people did *not* have access to the information Snowden leaked. http://20committee.com/2013/11/17/the-guardian-really-needs-to-stop-lying/ …
@DaveedGR Except... he has chosen not to link to Guardian saying that. He can. But he won't. Ergo his post is now false. @20committee
-
-
@emptywheel@20committee I saw that debate between the two of you. Dunno if the Guardian says it; I know that a lot of people do, though. -
@DaveedGR Well, Rusbridger HAS, at least once. But@20committee won't fix his post to make it accurate.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
-
@DaveedGR Yes. But look at sources. I'd have to look but think Guardian may have accurately stated 850K TS more often than not@20committee -
@emptywheel I lack time to go back over how Guardian framed it. The point's made often enough that@20committee's explanation is relevant. -
@DaveedGR Sure. But it's a very basic thing. To prove that Guardian does it@20committee provides 2 links proving sometimes they don't. -
@emptywheel@20committee That's a fair critique of his links, but Guardian *does* make that claim. Here, for example: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/21/gchq-cables-secret-world-communications-nsa … -
@DaveedGR Actually, says they had access to databases, NOT to docs. Rusbridger DOES say it at least once, but@20committee won't fix post. -
@emptywheel@20committee You're right. It says databases. These say docs: http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/defence-and-security-blog/2013/nov/11/gchq-nsa-leaks … &http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/sep/19/gchq-we-monster-we-cant-control … -
@DaveedGR Actually, only the opinion one does, I think, but it's not presented as news. The Rusbridger does tho.@20committee - 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@emptywheel his post is 'now false'? He has to link to something for it to b 'true'? So if I say the world is round?@DaveedGR@20committee -
@MorganCarlston "For one of the many iterations of this nonsense see here." is an error he refuses to correct.@DaveedGR@20committee
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.