@20committee Confused. Guardian story says, "one of 850,000 people in the US w/ TS clearance" Same claim you made. @LouiseMensch
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@LouiseMensch "... GCHQ databases" source: http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/21/gchq-cables-secret-world-communications-nsa … - which is a TOTAL lie, got it? BYE3 replies 2 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @20committee
@20committee It's still actually a stretch. But you're getting warmer. keep it up and your claim might be true one of these days.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
.
@emptywheel it's a LIE - which you would know if you actually knew anything about NSA & intel. Less lit PhD, more cryptology -#protip7 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @20committee
@20committee But again, I invite you to find a link that ACTUALLY says all 850,000 TS NSA and Contractors had access to ALL DBs.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel you're ridiculous, have a nice evening.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @20committee
@20committee So you CAN'T find a link that says what you say Guardian has said. Okay then.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
.
@emptywheel your inability to see what's clear to normal people is so lit-PhD-cliche it's terrifying.2 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @20committee
@20committee Yes. But I CAN see you won't present a link backing claim you made in the post. I suggested you keep trying, but you gave up.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Guardian has cited 850K lie dozens of time since July, knock yourself out.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
@20committee You say that. I don't rule it out. But thus far neither link you've offered says that.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.