Best part of DiFi's anon aides confirming what they're trying to deny is they do it by claiming they can count what NSA says they can't.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel If I understand what NSA is saying on that count, they’re stating a truth of basic principles, not just of resources.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @grumpybozo
@grumpybozo How so? In any case, if they know it to be small, that's not the practice they claim they can't count, no?4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel One can’t know the national status of a person who is spoken of in ‘content’ but not matched to a meatspace human. (1/3)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @grumpybozo
@grumpybozo To clarify, THEY'RE saying they can count USPs searched in content. They're saying they CAN'T count USPs searched via metadata.2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Same principle applies in metadata. More structured, but USP status of referents less knowable Content can illuminate (1/2)2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@grumpybozo They know how many times they've done it for content about (a few) but not how many times for content by USP.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.