I'm curious where the "samples" of location records came from. Does "relevance" now encompass "we need to run a software test"?
-
-
Replying to @normative
@normative "Well Mr. AT&T GC, we believe handing these over under voluntary foreign intell claim might lead to new profit center w/NSA."2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Sadly, on consideration, I think they're probably right to read ECPA as allowing voluntary production of international CDRs.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @normative
@normative International, sure. But Kris made it clear it was internationalandforeign, which actually includes a domestic link.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Right, that's what I mean. BECAUSE it says both, you have to read "international" as meaning "one end domestic"2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @normative
@normative And you think that's cool? Because once you go there you've basically eliminated entire purpose for FAA.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel No, it doesn't; the exemption only covers methods other than FISA "electronic surveillance"–like records acquisition.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@normative Ah, right. Assuming, of course, their definition of "foreign internet content" is same as their definition of domestic content.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.