David Kris's paper on dragnet spying cites US v. Jones exactly once, in a dismissive footnote. http://www.lawfareblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Lawfare-Research-Paper-Series-No.-4-1.pdf …
-
-
Replying to @JameelJaffer
@JameelJaffer Baby steps. Isn't that all an "aspirational" lawyer can expect? ;p (Don't they also call terrorists aspirational?)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Kris's relegation of Jones to a footnote is desperational.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @JameelJaffer
@JameelJaffer Sure, but unlike the entire active DOJ at least he wasn't shameful enough to leave it out altogether.
11:41 AM - 29 Sep 2013
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.