@emptywheel I'm not saying there were no misdeeds. Just that there are multiple ways to read what they're saying.
-
-
-
@RachelBLevinson And I'm saying the only way to read what the actual "violations" were are as "features." -
@emptywheel But whose violations are you talking about here? DOJ's? NSA's? -
@RachelBLevinson 1st, if FBI is accessing it illegally, it's FBI too. 2nd, bc of IG report & previous, DOJ doesn't g ave deniability. -
@emptywheel I understand that. I was literally addressing just that first comment. I don't think we're really at cross purposes here. -
@RachelBLevinson ah sorry. Carry on! - End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@emptywheel Or, in fairness, they believe the matters were so complicated & technical that lawyers & analysts were talking past each other. -
@RachelBLevinson Not fair. The "violations" were in fact the "features" of the illegal program they chose not to turn off in 2006.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@emptywheel@AngryVoters If the NSA is going to be consistent (and who doesn't want NSA consistency?) they should lie to everybody.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@emptywheel sorry. 3 year olds. Plus, having their rooms decorated in favorite tv shows, like 10 year olds!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@emptywheel Jawohl. They don't get along anyway.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@emptywheel Any person with half a brain would think the same. Time for them to stop finger pointing like three years olds!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.