@speechboy71 Sure. But if the US is--bc it, unlike any other nation--can conduct more aggressive financial spying, that's a problem.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Why is that a problem? It's not a problem for the United States1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @speechboy71
@speechboy71 Sure. Until such time as rest of world feels they need to treat US as pariah bc of it. It's nuclear armament.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Well obviously that isn't going to happen.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @speechboy71
@speechboy71 Fine. Then Dilma canceling a state dinner does no damage whatsoever to USFP.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Of course it does damage, at least in the near-term.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @speechboy71
@speechboy71 Dilma APPEARS to be making sound decision based on strategic issues. If we've played her bad strategic hand, it's our doing2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel It was the revelations that forced her hand - to the detriment of her country and the US1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @speechboy71
@speechboy71 You're assuming being nice to us w/o getting concessions is in Brazil's interest. Based on ... ?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I don't assume that all. I'm not sure why you think I do.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@speechboy71 "to the detriment of her country." Maybe she and her advisors don't agree?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.