Wait. Brits want evidence that Russian proposal is not a delay tactic. Can we have evidence Assad ordered CW attack first? Ferfucksake.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel There's this http://www.hrw.org/news/2013/09/10/syria-government-likely-culprit-chemical-attack …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanaHoule
@DanaHoule Yes. It says nothing abt chain of command, which even Admin suggests they have no evidence for (other suggest counterevidence)2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Eh, I’m not in favor of an attack, but I don’t find the chain of command issue to be a strong argument against. Command...1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @DanaHoule
@DanaHoule Given that ours would be illegal attack, and we don't hold our own command structure accountable, forgoes legitimacy.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel And given that Russia and China get to decide if it’s legal or illegal, that argument hasn’t done a lot for me.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanaHoule
@DanaHoule No. It's illegal on its face, both domestically and internationally.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I happen to think CW can justify a response, even though Syria nearly only country that didn’t sign the treaty. I remember...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanaHoule
@DanaHoule It might justify a response, but not from people who are already engaged in admitted covert action against him.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel So it follows that if we’d been involved in covert action against Rwanda in 1992 we couldn’t have justified action in 1993?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@DanaHoule First, that MON was still being relied on 1 year ago. So we STILL have POTUS policy of letting Assad torture to fight terror.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.