The evidence Assad used chemical weapons is compelling. The case to respond by bombing Syria for no political objective is not compelling.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel not using missiles or bombs, they used shells, which do not explode btw, all you hear is a quiet 'tink'@MoonofA3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Galrahn2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel It's discussed in Fr intel rept: Se "Les vecteurs," page 4 and 5: http://www.gouvernement.fr/sites/default/files/fichiers_joints/syrie_synthese_nationale_de_renseignement_declassifie_02_09_2013.pdf …@Galrahn@MoonofA2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @WyldDarkHeart
@WyldDarkHeart Right. It lists vectors then describes a helicopter not using missiles. Reason I'm asking here. @Galrahn @MoonofA
11:11 AM - 5 Sep 2013
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.