The evidence Assad used chemical weapons is compelling. The case to respond by bombing Syria for no political objective is not compelling.
-
-
@emptywheel not using missiles or bombs, they used shells, which do not explode btw, all you hear is a quiet 'tink'@MoonofA -
-
@emptywheel I've only seen evidence of shells, via french media photographs. On Aug 21 nothing yet.@MoonofA
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@emptywheel in Jobar, they would fire 1 shell under cover of machine gun. Then gas suit dudes would go remove the shell after.@MoonofAThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@emptywheel the French reporting on this with their embed reporters is excellent.@MoonofA -
-
@emptywheel yes, the French media has been covering the tactical use in Jabor since April. Photographs and details.@MoonofA
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.