@emptywheel Great question.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@emptywheel@stephenrwalli because the ICC can only act upon orders of the UN Security Council and al-Assad is backed by China and Russia. -
@mpawlo@emptywheel Perfect. Thank you. Needed the context.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@4Dgifts@emptywheel The irony, it burns :\Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@emptywheel no jurisdiction unless referred by security council. Not happening with Russia veto.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@emptywheel Was there any time we did that other than Milosevic? This country puts its faith in war, not courts.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@emptywheel defense contractors?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@emptywheel That would seem to be a rational decision.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@emptywheel Because we want him to go into exile. ICC indictment makes it more likely he fights to bitter end (see Gaddafi regime.)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@emptywheel Issue belongs at the Hague. Bombing them is no answerThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@emptywheel You know the answer I guess? This is a rhetoric q, isn't it?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.