Henceforward, Defense Attorneys should challenge every single thing claimed as an AT&T subpoena.
-
-
@emptywheel@gracels Also, note data "goes back to 1987" (slide#3), but "First court order from WA submitted in Dec 2012" (slide#13) -
-
@emptywheel@gracels Well, yes, or at least giving it better legal cover.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@emptywheel@bmaz Unsurprising.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@emptywheel@gracels I am not aware of any affis being revealed in AZ to date. Shocking, I know.....Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.