@jeffreycarr The Chertoff Group consults with the US government in exchange for money. They say so on their website. @emptywheel
-
-
-
Replying to @jeffreycarr
@jeffreycarr I got that off their website a few months ago. It was in their general description of what they do.@emptywheel2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TimothyS
@TimothyS@emptywheel If you look under Services, there's no mention. It's all focused on corporate clients. And I've been told the same.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jeffreycarr
@jeffreycarr "Senior gov't...leaders regularly call on [CG] to help them confront their most difficult security challenges."@emptywheel1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TimothyS
@TimothyS@emptywheel Probably foreign gov't. My point is, they aren't part of the intel budget and they don't get federal contracts.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jeffreycarr
@jeffreycarr Come on, they would say so! It means US government. Not all Booz or SAIC is in the budget either.@emptywheel1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TimothyS
@TimothyS@emptywheel Relationships, of course. They all come out of gov. That shouldn't be interpreted to read on the gov payroll.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jeffreycarr
@jeffreycarr It's actually remarkable how people defend Brenner's right not to disclose. Why? Is he embarrassed by it?@TimothyS2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@TimothyS 1. It's not relevant to his blog post. 2. He does disclose on his full bio. 3. I'm done arguing. Hv a good night.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@jeffreycarr yes, I understand that you don't think someone in industry arguing industry $$ should be hidden should disclose. @TimothyS
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.