Not a single member of White House #NSA review panel is younger than 54. None were younger than 40 when #Napster hit big.
#TechIgnorance
-
-
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq@emptywheel I don't think it's fair to label@peterpswire tech ignorant. (I am 100% biased, however.)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JoeBeOne
@JoeBeOne I'm not saying he's tech ignorant. I'm saying he's not a technologist.@BradMossEsq@peterpswire1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@JoeBeOne To be fair, I said it. However, as a general rule, I assume anyone over 45 is tech ignorant until proven otherwise.4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq I ALSO wouldn't call Richard Clarke tech ignorant, by any shade. Don't like all his tech beliefs, though.@JoeBeOne2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@JoeBeOne Clarke is the exception to most rules.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BradMossEsq
@BradMossEsq Actually curious how you think Morell will be. TOTALLY inappropriate having CIA on committee. But ... as a person?@JoeBeOne1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@JoeBeOne As far as I always knew he was a reliable internal Agency guy. Not sure what he is doing on this review panel2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@BradMossEsq One thing my recent reading has made more clear is degree to which targeting can be bad bc CIA feeds bad intell. @JoeBeOne
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.