@emptywheel I 2 puzzled re upstream/Prism recertifications; wonder if '12 newsletter wrong (contradicted by '11 one?) http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/24/us/nsa-said-to-have-paid-e-mail-providers-millions-to-cover-costs-from-court-ruling.html …
@charlie_savage Right. But FBI only serves as 215 agent bc it twists application of a law. Under 702, NSA can get content directly.
-
-
@emptywheel Given apparent disconnect between Oct 2011 newsletter & Oct 2012 one, this may just be red herring territory. -
@charlie_savage Except the minimization procedures make it crystal clear: Internet is either FBI-involved or upstream. -
@emptywheel I read as 3 cats of non-packet-stream info: a) metadata, b) emails from providers obtained w/ FBI & c) other "discrete" messages
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.