@stuartmillar159 @emptywheel This was my reading as well--they say opinion had no affect on PRISM.
-
-
Replying to @KevinBankston
@KevinBankston Right. I'm suggesting that means Google and Yahoo may be participating in 702 outside of PRISM.@stuartmillar1591 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@stuartmillar159 Suppose I will wait to see your next piece; not yet following the logic there.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @KevinBankston
@emptywheel@stuartmillar159 I mean, any extension or renewal would require cutting a new check, right?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KevinBankston
@KevinBankston I'm less interested in $--that's statutory. Q: why did it take so long to get certification that would work?@stuartmillar1592 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@KevinBankston key point to me was that millions of dollars being reimbursed to companies who deny all knowledge of Prism2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @stuartmillar159
@stuartmillar159 But I'm wondering if 1) part of $$ was abt changes they made 2) upstream was problem.@KevinBankston1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel yeah that's a very tantalising question@KevinBankston1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @stuartmillar159
@stuartmillar159 Imagine if Google (w/HTTPS) ONLY provided upstream. That might explain pique at being called PRISM.@KevinBankston1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel they were specifically named as Prism in these docs and the original PowerPoint. But it's an intriguing thought@KevinBankston5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@stuartmillar159 Clealry, by their own answer, email is an MCT (upstream) collection. But where and how? @KevinBankston
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.