We usually discuss upstream collection as telecoms providing from switches. But if Google & Yahoo upstream as well... http://www.emptywheel.net/2013/08/23/why-would-prism-providers-need-to-pay-millions-for-new-certificates-on-upstream-collection/ …
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel it explicitly wasn't about upstream. Just the knock-on effect of the ruling was all certifications getting temp extensions1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @stuartmillar159
@stuartmillar159@emptywheel This was my reading as well--they say opinion had no affect on PRISM.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KevinBankston
@KevinBankston Right. I'm suggesting that means Google and Yahoo may be participating in 702 outside of PRISM.@stuartmillar1591 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@stuartmillar159 Suppose I will wait to see your next piece; not yet following the logic there.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @KevinBankston
@emptywheel@stuartmillar159 I mean, any extension or renewal would require cutting a new check, right?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@KevinBankston And that getting Google and Yahoo upstream production compliant w/Bates took lots of effort. @stuartmillar159
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.