"Necessary redactions" make emails (possibly to #AlAulaqi?) irrelevant; Nidal Hasan judge excludes them fm evidence: http://goo.gl/rWGizA
@ShayanaKadidal How can they be Awlaki? Text of those released in Webster report?
-
-
@emptywheel thanks, hadn't seen Webster report (http://goo.gl/BENRCm ) seems conclusively to say no incrim. emails from Aulaqi to Hasan. -
@ShayanaKadidal Precisely. Hasan incriminated himself. BUt they had far more--and far more timely--than that.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.