@onekade Don't think they have to seek additional authority w/incidental. Or with back door/reverse.
@onekade And note that doesn't even include the "if it represents threat to property, keep notwithstanding."
-
-
@emptywheel right. or any other crime. -
@onekade But threats to property are pre-crime. -
@emptywheel jeebus i missed this. did you write about it? -
@onekade I did, which means it's VERY obscure. http://www.emptywheel.net/2013/06/26/fisa-amendments-act-minimization-preventing-serious-harm-to-corporate-persons/ … But I was wrong. They need DIRNSA approval there. -
@emptywheel gotcha.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.