@blakehounshell @benjaminwittes and yet admin failed to say that in a clear cut way
@benjaminwittes Are you done then? You have yet to present an explanation that is NOT an existing category. @gracels
-
-
@emptywheel Now I have no idea what you're talking about. I didn't list the subcategories… Or rather, I listed two: roaming and tech errors. -
@benjaminwittes Yes. I'm suggesting that anyone ignoring due diligence (and, probably, resource) category ignoring problems w/Admin claims -
@emptywheel Yes, I understand that you're saying that. I'm just suggesting that you're probably over-reading the malevolence of the DD cat -
@benjaminwittes And I'm pointing out that every non-willful explanation you offer falls into human error, training, or resource. -
@emptywheel Yes, that's where we disagree. I don't think that's right. And I doubt that the authors of rept meant lack of dd to mean willful -
@benjaminwittes OF COURSE they didn't mean dd means willful. Category exists so they can say "sure we broke rules, but not willfully."
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.