@RachelBLevinson Rem when NSA asked for illegal wiretap cooperation it ran away if cos asked to consult OUTSIDE lawyer @dametzger @JoeBeOne
@RachelBLevinson It's crazy. BC the tech details are critical to any constitutional case. @JoeBeOne
-
-
@emptywheel You mean to argue 4th Amendment issues?@JoeBeOne -
@RachelBLevinson Right. Imagine being Yahoo arguing PAA unconstitutional w/o knowing what minimization permitted after collection@JoeBeOne -
@emptywheel That is, you need to know what info is being obtained & what's happening to it. But not nec'ly the HOW.@JoeBeOne -
@RachelBLevinson When you say "you need" do you mean to be able to make Constitutional argument? You may need how.@JoeBeOne -
@emptywheel@RachelBLevinson even to make a stat arg, e.g., *The Company* in 9th Circuit that modifying service for tapping is disruptive -
@JoeBeOne@emptywheel Well, that's true. Right - I guess I was envisioning a one-time thing, rather than on-going modification to service. -
@RachelBLevinson@emptywheel technically, it appears he'd have to modify server software to capture keys or passwords that are not now - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.