@emptywheel @RachelBLevinson @JoeBeOne Bound to secrecy when disclosure "may interfere with diplomatic relations" http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/intel/RL33320.pdf …
-
-
Replying to @dametzger
@dametzger But that wouldn't override the ability to disclose to an attorney, would it? Just gets you the gag order.@emptywheel@JoeBeOne1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RachelBLevinson
@RachelBLevinson Rem when NSA asked for illegal wiretap cooperation it ran away if cos asked to consult OUTSIDE lawyer@dametzger@JoeBeOne1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@RachelBLevinson@dametzger hmmm, that feels closer! maybe this guy is not Lavabit but Ladar's lawyer?!2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JoeBeOne
@JoeBeOne Elsewhere he said making request in VA (assume EDVA) added difficulty of response for him.@RachelBLevinson@dametzger1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@RachelBLevinson@dametzger ah, TX vs VA2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JoeBeOne
@JoeBeOne Also suspect they're asking for technical enough issue that would require SCIF or similar@RachelBLevinson1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel You mean even to discuss? Or to produce/analyze?@JoeBeOne2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RachelBLevinson
@RachelBLevinson So I suspect 1) highly technical demand, 2) limits on how htey could comm/respond@JoeBeOne3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel ... that basically only he & the govt (and a few others) understand, and isn't really a legal issue?@JoeBeOne3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@RachelBLevinson That's what I'm wondering. Maybe he can share THAT he got demand for tech access, but not the how. @JoeBeOne
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.