I've posted a section-by-section review, with brief comments, re the 4 surveillance reforms POTUS announced todayhttp://www.lawfareblog.com/2013/08/the-presidents-surveillance-reform-initiatives-a-section-by-section-analysis/ …
-
-
Replying to @BobbyChesney
.
@BobbyChesney Most striking part to me was that in the Q&A he said that none of these reforms were actually necessary to prevent abuse2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @naureenshah
@naureenshah But I appreciate that is no comfort at all from POV of those who do not want gvt accessing this info period or w/out ind. susp.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BobbyChesney
@BobbyChesney He would have done more for his credibility if he had outlined what 215 abuses and/or Fourth violation was.@naureenshah1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@naureenshah Excellent point. Key reason debate gets gummed up is different unspoken premises on what = abuse.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BobbyChesney
@BobbyChesney Don't say abuse. Use the language of the 2009, 2011, and white paper abt problems. But don't ignore they exist@naureenshah1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@bobbychesney Your question about why FISC ordered changes to the program cuz of its unconstitutionality would be a smart reveal1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @speechboy71
@speechboy71 Right. Esp since as he was speaking EFF got notice they're going to get the ruling. It's gonna come out.@bobbychesney1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@bobbychesney Yup. The presser would have been a good place to preview it.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@speechboy71 Even the 215 problems may come out, now that DOJ IG finally reviewing it after Admin prevented required review. @bobbychesney
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.