@emptywheel I believe, Constitutionally speaking, it will cause Senators McCain and Graham to issue a statement that pisses me off.
-
-
-
@conor64 Which is another way of saying that if it passes, it will ensure debate CONTINUES, albeit w/McCain/Graham blathering as part of it - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@emptywheel@normative and if it's law will it be adhered to?..the genie is out of the bottleThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@emptywheel Thin@normative got delayed at confunction junctionThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@emptywheel "If [the House] vote yes, what happens?" "Then I go to the Senate and the whole thing starts all over again!" "Oh no!" "Oh yes!"Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@emptywheel@normative Need to make sure it doesn't morph N2 the "Complete & Utter Safety & Security Act of 2013" where NSA funding triplesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@emptywheel@normative Have you written anything on how 3rd Party Doc figures into NSA/FBI's justifications? -
@dametzger@emptywheel I mean, it's one sentence: None of these records have Fourth Amendment protection -
@normative Solely because of 3rd Party Doc? That is profoundly flawed. -
@dametzger Yup. And yup. -
@normative So why no groundswell to, at the very least, revisit 3rd Party Doctrine?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.