Most of you would rather argue about "who's a journalist?" We would be smarter to protect the ACT of journalism. http://www.emptywheel.net/2013/07/14/why-members-of-the-news-media-should-welcome-a-shield-for-the-act-of-journalism/#sthash.CzXBZe5J.dpuf …
-
-
Replying to @jayrosen_nyu
@jayrosen_nyu Really? I don't think anything Tim Russert did could be construed as an ACT of journalism & he was NBC News' WDC bureau chief.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CorinneAM
@CorinneAM In other words, "Who's a journalist? Not Tim Russert!"2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jayrosen_nyu
@jayrosen_nyu When Russert said that any govt official who called was presumptively off the record, is that an act of journalism?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CorinneAM
@CorinneAM I get it. Russert was not a journalist, according to@CorinneAM.@emptywheel was trying to locate the act of definition we need.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jayrosen_nyu
@jayrosen_nyu No, I asked if you thought Russert's OTR presumptions acts of journalism. Even if@emptywheel locates the act, who decides?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@CorinneAM Part of my point, right now, is DOJ reserves right to define what journalism is themselves. That's a problem. @jayrosen_nyu
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.