@20committee Again, that was also presumed and reflected in my point. @DaveedGR
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@DaveedGR Perhaps obvious to you. You have very little understanding of cross-INT dynamics in US IC.1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @20committee
@20committee Assuming that's true, how in a counterfactual do we know what might be?@DaveedGR1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@20committee decrease in sigint capabilities cannot be replaced with other "ints" like humint, if that's what you asked2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @entropy68
@entropy68 Nope. Not exactly. It's if we didn't have distinct technical advantages in SIGINT we'd approach intel differently.@20committee2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@entropy68 But we do, and always have ....1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @20committee
@20committee Which, again, was built into my question. I think you've agreed that Snowden revelations may lessen that advantage?@entropy682 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@entropy68 Lot of damage to NSA programs here, but how serious TBD.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @20committee
@20committee But I doubt many countries have will/$$ to move off US-centric backbone.@entropy681 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel@entropy68 Right, and that's where the rubber hits road here. Anti-NSA efforts would be costly and difficult.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@20committee Preferring euro providers cheaper, but still of limited effect. Backbone = prohibitive. @entropy68
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.