Really helpful SCOTUSblog post on what EPIC is trying to do w/the Section 215 order. http://www.scotusblog.com/2013/07/challenge-to-global-phone-taps/ …
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Massive collection = Standing! "EPIC’s filing tells the Court that EPIC 'is a Verizon customer.'"1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JayAckroyd
@JayAckroyd Dunno. Govt has (w/wikileaks) claimed things that weren't DECLASSed can't be used in court.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Even SCOTUS? This just gets more and more Kafka (or Heller) esque.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JayAckroyd
@JayAckroyd Govt falsely claimed would alert crim defendants when IDed by 702. Hasn't happened. They will do a LOT to prevent standing1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel Well, they certainly don't want to argue merits, do they?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JayAckroyd
@JayAckroyd Right. THey seem quite certain their arguments won't stand up to antagonist and/or public scrutiny.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel And also quite certain that they can peddle the standing stand indefinitely. You'd think judges would resent that....2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@JayAckroyd Dunno. Given what Kagan said at #AspenIdeas (that 4th amendment issues is growth industry), I'm not so sure.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.