Remember that NSA/FBI's telco / internet metadata collection is far more revealing (and involves a lot more data) than physical mail imaging
-
-
Replying to @mattblaze
@mattblaze And remember that we still don't know whether FBI or NCTC get both to data mine in common.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel True, and if you're an analyst, the more metadata the merrier.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mattblaze
@mattblaze And NCTC is permitted by law to have anyone's database unless other laws prohibit it. Does 215 prohibit sharing of the dragnet?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
@emptywheel I believe 215 requires that the data be relevant to a CT or CI investigation, but says nothing about sharing within govt.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mattblaze
@mattblaze@emptywheel sub (h) governs sharing - generally, must be in line w/ secret FBI minimization proc. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/1861 …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @astepanovich
@astepanovich@emptywheel With a big exception for anything with evidence of a past or future crime.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@mattblaze And possibly the NSA exception for threat to property, which I think comes fr treating corps as legal people. @astepanovich
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.